Choosing Accessible Colours in eLearning Design: Contrast, Combinations & Legal Compliance

Choosing colours that work for everyone isn't a design luxury—it's accessibility. Learn how high contrast, colour-blind-friendly palettes, and WCAG 2.2 standards make your online courses, websites, and infographics actually readable for all users.
Blog cover for Choosing-Accessible-Colours-in-Learning-Design

The difference between readable and illegible design often comes down to colour. A few years back, I watched a presentation on colour blindness that completely shifted how I think about design. The speaker—a designer with red-green colour blindness—described the frustration of sitting through data-heavy presentations where critical information was conveyed only through red and green dots. That moment stuck with me. It’s easy to overlook how many people struggle with digital content that sighted, non-colour-blind people take for granted.

If you’re creating online courses, building web content, or designing infographics, accessibility in colour choice isn’t a nice-to-have—it’s fundamental. Getting colour right means your work actually reaches the people you’re trying to help. This guide walks you through practical strategies for selecting colours that work for everyone, grounded in current WCAG standards and international accessibility regulations that are now legally binding in many regions.

Why Accessible Colours Matter

Colours don’t just look nice. They actively shape how people understand and navigate your content. Yet for many users, standard colour choices create real barriers.

Around 1 in 12 men and 1 in 200 women experience some form of colour vision deficiency. Red-green colour blindness tops the list, but it’s far from the only problem. People with low vision struggle with insufficient contrast. Those with light sensitivity find bright screens painful. Cognitive disabilities mean some users process colour differently depending on context and fatigue levels.

Here’s the thing: accessibility standards aren’t abstract guidelines drawn up by committee. They reflect real needs. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.2, published October 2023 and updated December 2024) emerged from decades of research and user testing. The European Accessibility Act (now mandatory across the EU as of 28 June 2025) and Section 508 (US) took these standards and made them legally mandatory. Organisations now face genuine legal consequences for failing to comply. More importantly, many people—clients, students, employees—can’t access your content if you skip this step.

 

Best Practices for Accessible Colours

 

1 Prioritise High Contrast First

Start with contrast. This is non-negotiable. WCAG 2.2 sets clear minimums:

  • 4.5:1 contrast ratio for regular text
  • 3:1 contrast ratio for large text (18pt/24px regular weight or 14pt/18.66px bold)

Black text on white? That hits 21:1. It’s the safest bet. Light blue on white? That might only be 3:1, which fails for body text. You need actual numbers, not guesswork.

Use the WebAIM Contrast Checker or WCAG Colour Contrast Checker—both are free—to test your combinations. These tools are freely available and should become part of your standard workflow. Testing takes two minutes. Not testing costs you users and, increasingly, legal exposure.

See the WebAIM Contrast checker for accessible colours in action:

WebAIM Contrast checker simulation for accessible colours
Contrast checker simulation for accessible colours

2 Avoid Colour-Only Communication

This mistake shows up constantly: a red line means danger, a green line means safe. Sounds clear? Not for 8% of men with red-green colour blindness. To them, both lines look identical.

Your data visualisations, status indicators, and warning messages need more than colour. Layer in labels, icons, patterns, or symbols. Green and red buttons? Add “Approved” and “Rejected” text. A chart with red and green lines? Include distinct line patterns (solid, dashed, dotted) and clear legends. This practice isn’t just accessibility—it’s better design for everyone, regardless of how their eyes work.

WCAG 2.2 Success Criterion 1.4.1 explicitly requires this. It’s not ambiguous.

3 Choose Colours That Actually Work for Colour-Blind Eyes

You don’t need to memorise which combinations fail. But knowing a few key facts helps immensely.

Red-green pairings? Avoid entirely. Blue-yellow combinations create problems for some users, as do green-brown and blue-purple pairings. These aren’t edge cases—roughly 8% of men experience red-green deficiency alone.

Here’s what does work reliably: blue paired with orange or red. This combination remains distinguishable across protanopia, deuteranopia, and tritanopia—essentially all common types of colour vision deficiency. Research backs this up consistently. For any data visualisation or infographic requiring multiple colours, starting with a blue-orange palette is your safest bet.

Use free tools to verify. Coblis is a colour blindness simulator—paste your design and see exactly how it appears to users with different colour vision types. Testing takes minutes and eliminates guesswork.  

See the examples from the Coblis is a colour blindness simulator for different types of vision impairment:

4 Apply the 60-30-10 Principle

This principle comes from design theory and it actually works for accessibility. The 60-30-10 rule suggests:

  • 60%: Dominant colour (usually your background)
  • 30%: Secondary colour (supporting elements)
  • 10%: Accent colour (calls-to-action, highlights)

Why does this matter? Overloading a design with multiple colours creates cognitive load. It’s particularly taxing for users with cognitive disabilities. Spreading colours deliberately—giving one colour room to breathe, using a second for structure, reserving a third for emphasis—creates natural hierarchy.

5 Design Infographics with Pattern and Colour Together

Infographics live or die by clarity. Yes, colour helps. But colour alone isn’t enough.

Choose balanced, well-contrasted palettes. Avoid oversaturation or muddy pastels. But here’s the critical bit: combine colours with distinct patterns or textures. Different hues with matching patterns confuse people. Different patterns with matching hues confuse colour-blind users. Use both. Add labels. Repeat information across multiple channels. This redundancy isn’t wasteful—it’s what makes infographics actually work.

6 Be Cautious with Bright and Fluorescent Tones

Neon green backgrounds and bright orange text cause eye strain. Some users experience light sensitivity; for them, fluorescent colours trigger headaches or visual fatigue. Muted, slightly desaturated tones work better—especially for backgrounds. Pair them with high-contrast text and your design stays readable without causing discomfort.

 

WCAG 2.2 Updates Worth Knowing

WCAG 2.2, released in October 2023 and updated in December 2024, added several success criteria relevant to visual design:

Focus Not Obscured (2.4.11 and 2.4.12) ensures keyboard focus indicators remain visible. This matters for colour accessibility because focus states need adequate contrast with surrounding elements. A light-coloured focus ring on a light background renders invisible. Your interactive elements need careful colour planning across multiple states—default, hover, focus, active, disabled.

Focus Appearance (2.4.13) sets minimum size and contrast standards for focus indicators themselves. Designers often treat focus states as an afterthought, but WCAG 2.2 now considers them front and centre.

These updates reflect a shift toward viewing accessibility holistically. Static content matters. Interactive elements matter even more.

Tools (All Free, Definitely Use Them)

  • WebAIM Contrast Checker – Industry standard for testing contrast ratios. Paste two colours, get precise contrast ratios and WCAG compliance status.
  • WCAG Colour Contrast Checker – Dedicated tool from AccessibleWeb. Quick and reliable.
  • AudioEye Colour Contrast Checker – Another solid free option for rapid testing.
  • Color Oracle – Colour blindness simulator. Download, run it, preview your designs exactly as colour-blind users see them.
  • Coblis Colour Blindness Simulator – Free online simulator. Upload your design or navigate to a website and it shows how different types of colour vision deficiency perceive it.
  • Adobe Colour Wheel – Includes accessibility filters if you prefer working within design software.

Colour Combinations That Work

These pairings have been tested and work reliably. Always verify contrast ratios for your specific usage:

Colour PairContrast RatioUse CaseNotes
Dark blue (#003366) on white (#FFFFFF)12.6:1Body text, primary contrastExcellent for readability
Black (#000000) on light yellow (#FFFFE0)19.6:1Headlines, emphasisWarm tone, distinctive
Navy blue (#000080) on white (#FFFFFF)15.5:1Professional settingsSlightly less harsh than pure black
Dark blue (#003d82) with orange (#FF6A00)Varies by shadeData visualisation, chartsOptimal for colour-blind users
Teal (#008080) with dark pink (#C71585)Varies by shadeMulti-colour designsDistinguishable across most colour deficiencies
Dark grey (#333333) on light grey (#F2F2F2)11.7:1Secondary contrastSofter than pure black/white

For multi-colour data visualisations, prioritise blue-orange or blue-red combinations as your primary colour differentiators. Supplement with patterns or textual labels for additional categories.

What Not to Do (And Why People Get This Wrong)

Now that we’ve covered what works, let’s talk about the mistakes that genuinely trip up designers—even experienced ones.

1 Don’t Use Red and Green Together

Red-green feels intuitive. Green for good, red for bad. Stop-light logic. Unfortunately, roughly 8% of men have red-green colour blindness. To them, these colours appear almost identical. You’re essentially telling them the same information twice in a way they can’t distinguish.

Avoid red-green pairings entirely. Status indicators, charts, alerts, infographics—wherever information hinges on these colours, you’re excluding people unnecessarily.

2 Don’t Rely on Blue-Purple, Green-Brown, or Similar Combinations

Beyond red-green, several pairings cause problems:

  • Blue and purple are too similar in hue. Users with tritanopia (blue-yellow colour blindness) particularly struggle
  • Green and brown blend together for many colour-blind users
  • Blue and grey offer insufficient distinction for users with certain deficiencies
  • Green paired with blue, grey, or black similarly lacks adequate contrast

Test combinations before finalising. Don’t guess.

3 Don’t Create Low Contrast Between Text and Background

Designers sometimes pair light grey text with white backgrounds, thinking it looks sophisticated. It looks terrible for anyone with low vision. Yellow text on a bright background? Same problem. These combinations fail WCAG 2.2’s 4.5:1 minimum contrast ratio by a huge margin.

Run everything through a contrast checker. It takes 30 seconds and saves you from publishing inaccessible content.

4 Don’t Rely Solely on Colour to Communicate Information

This is perhaps the most frequent mistake I see. Status indicators, pie charts, categorical breakdowns—designers use colour alone to distinguish categories. Without accompanying labels, text, or patterns, you’re creating an access barrier for colour-blind users and often for low-vision users too.

Always supplement colour with additional communication methods. This isn’t extra work—it’s actually better information design.

5 Don’t Pair Similar Hues Without Checking Contrast

Red and orange seem different until you realise they don’t have adequate luminosity (brightness) contrast. Purple and magenta. Dark navy and black. Colours can differ in hue but still fail because their brightness values are too similar.

Use a contrast checker to verify luminosity contrast, not just hue difference.

6 Don’t Use Oversaturated or Pastel Palettes Without Testing

Bright, saturated colours can improve visibility, but excessively neon tones cause eye strain and fatigue. Pastels look soft but often fail contrast requirements entirely. Always test against actual WCAG standards before committing to your palette.

7 Don’t Skip Colour Blindness Simulation

This one is straightforward: don’t design something you haven’t tested with a colour blindness simulator. Coblis and Color Oracle are free. Your design appearing fine to your own eyes doesn’t mean it’s accessible. Spend five minutes simulating. It catches problems that contrast checkers alone won’t catch.

8 Don’t Use Yellow as a Standalone Foreground Colour

Yellow creates a specific problem. It requires lightness to be visible, which means it’s inherently low-contrast against bright backgrounds. Yellow text on white? Nearly invisible. If yellow is essential to your design, pair it with an adjacent dark UI element to provide context and prevent information loss for colour-blind users.

9 Don’t Treat WCAG Compliance as Optional

This is a business problem, not a design problem. WCAG 2.2 compliance isn’t optional—not anymore. The European Accessibility Act mandates it. Section 508 requires it. The Americans with Disabilities Act enforces it. Organisations skipping accessibility face real legal risk.

In 2024 alone, over 4,600 digital accessibility lawsuits were filed in the US under ADA requirements. These numbers are climbing. Accessibility isn’t a feature. It’s a legal requirement and a basic matter of respect.

Relevant Standards and Regulations

WCAG 2.2 (October 2023, Updated December 2024) – The latest web accessibility standard from the W3C. Colour-specific requirements appear in Success Criterion 1.4.1 (Use of Colour), 1.4.3 (Contrast Minimum), and the newer 2.4.11–2.4.13 (Focus Visibility). This is your primary reference.

European Accessibility Act (Effective 28 June 2025) – EU-wide requirement for digital accessibility. New digital content must comply now; existing content has until 28 June 2030. This covers websites, apps, e-learning platforms, and digital documents.

Section 508 (US, 2017 with Ongoing Updates) – Requires federal agencies and contractors to meet accessibility standards. Many US states and private organisations follow Section 508 as their accessibility baseline.

In Summary

Good colour design is invisible—people notice when you get it wrong, not when you get it right. The goal isn’t to win design awards for your palette. It’s to ensure your content is readable, understandable, and accessible to as many people as possible.

The mechanics are straightforward: prioritise contrast, test combinations against actual standards, avoid colour-only communication, and use freely available tools. The 60-30-10 rule creates natural visual hierarchy. Blue-orange combinations work reliably for colour-blind audiences. None of this requires specialised knowledge.

What changes everything is actually doing it. Not planning to do it. Actually doing it. Test your current designs against WCAG 2.2 standards today. With the European Accessibility Act taking effect on 28 June 2025, waiting isn’t an option. Your students, clients, and employees depend on this. So do a lot of people you’ll never meet.

Select the heading and arrow below to view additional resources on accessibility. 

  1. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2
  2. WCAG 2 Overview
  3. WCAG 2.2: What You Need to Know
  4. The Future is Accessible: The ABC of WCAG 2.2
  5. WCAG 2.2: Key Updates and Guidelines for Web Accessibility
  6. European Accessibility Act 2025: Everything You Need to Know
  7. EU Accessibility Act 2025: 5 Best Practices
  8. The European Accessibility Act 2025: An Internet for All
  9. European Accessibility Act – What It Is and How to Implement It
  10. A Checklist for the European Accessibility Act (EAA)
  11. Fact Sheet: New Rule on the Accessibility of Web Content
  12. Making Color Usage Accessible
  13. Accessible Colour Palettes
  14. Accessibility and Colour
  15. How to Make Scientific Figures Accessible to Readers with Color Blindness
  16. Colour Blindness Statistics 2025 By Vision Deficiency
  17. A Global Perspective of Color Vision Deficiency
  18. About Colour Blindness
  19. The Misuse of Colour in Science Communication
  20. Creating Accessible Digital Colour Palettes Using the 60-30-10 Design Rule
  21. Accessible Colors: A Complete Guide for Web Design
  22. Inclusive Website Color Palettes for Accessibility
  23. A Practical Guide To Designing For Colorblind People
  24. Colorblind-Friendly Palettes: Why & How to Use in Design
  25. Guide to Accessible Colours Palettes [Templates Included]
  26. An Introduction to Colour Blindness Accessibility
  27. Common Mistakes with Using Colour in Accessibility
  28. Colour Blindness & Colour Choices
  29. Inclusive Design: Colour Accessibility
  30. What Colours to Avoid in Your Designs for ADA Compliance
  31. Yellow, Purple, and the Myth of “Accessibility Limits Colour Palettes”
  32. The “Dark Yellow Problem” in Design System Colour Palettes
  33. Colour Contrast Accessibility: Complete WCAG Guide
  34. Colour Contrast and Accessibility – A Complete Guide
  35. WCAG Colour Contrast Checker
  36. Contrast Checker
  37. Colour Contrast Checker
  38. Colour Safe – Accessible Web Colour Combinations
  39. Coloring for Colourblindness

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

 

Subscribe to my mailing list and get the tools!

Note, that this post provides general information about Accessible Colours.

It is important always to consider the specific context and requirements of your learning projects. If you have any questions or would like to delve deeper into the topic, please email me or book a free online consultation via my contact page.

planning - Design - developing

Make sure to check out my other posts related to planning online courses, designing and developing learning content and delivering training. I share strategies and tools that you can use and many practical tips. 

JOIN MY NETWORK, STAY CONNECTED, GET IN TOUCH!
JOIN MY NETWORK!
RELATED POSTS
Blog Cover for Online Course Delivery - Implementation, Enrolment, delivery and support
Learn how to master Online Course Delivery by turning a finished course into a reliable system that goes far beyond simple file sharing, with the right LMS setup, smooth enrolment flows, and clear learner support. Discover how to assemble your content into a structured learning space, configure access, pacing, and certificates, and run simple but effective quality assurance checks so learners can move from sign‑up to first lesson without friction. You will also find practical ways to plan onboarding, emails, and self‑service resources so your Online Course Delivery runs smoothly for both you and your learners...
Hi, I am Gerta.
Welcome to my blog.
Gerta Nestorov Image
Do you need help designing online training?

Get in touch!

Scroll to Top